Factors Favoring Mediation
- An important, on-going relationship exists between the parties
- Those with authority to make important decisions are present or can be present forthe mediation
- One side maintains unrealistic views and would benefit from considering the casein a different light
- The parties are open to considering the case in a different light
- The parties are genuinely interested in compromise
- The general attitude of each side toward the other is relatively objective
- Multiple parties are involved, increasing time and cost of litigation
- Both parties seek a speedy and inexpensive resolution to the dispute
- Desire to avoid publicity
- Confidentiality is of great concern to at least one of the parties
- Both sides wish to avoid burdensome, intrusive, or costly full-blown discoveryIssues involved in the dispute are complex or highly technical
- Disputed issues are based upon fact but do not turn on the credibility of keywitnesses
- At least one side seeks a resolution that a court could not grant, such as amodification of the relationship
- Parties wish to have effective control over the outcome of the dispute and avoid arestrictive imposed outcome
- The claim is not frivolous
- There is no need to create legal precedent
- There is no need for injunctive relief
- The chances of winning at trial are uncertain
Factors Against Mediation
- Existence of collateral issues that may enhance resolution in a mediation setting
- Need to establish legal precedent
- Frivolous case, absent a bona fide dispute
- Entire case likely to be decided on motion to dismiss or summary judgment
- Need for more time before settlement options can be evaluated
- Parties have not been named or made aware of the dispute
- Authorized decision maker not available
- Financial limitations prevent serious settlement negotiations
- Past settlement was breached by one of the parties
- Parties not genuinely interested in compromise
- Need for immediate equitable relief